spatch: (MBTA Quarter)
[personal profile] spatch
Most of the T bus drivers I've seen in Somerville are okay folks. In the past few years I've had some interesting conversations with a few of the local drivers on the 90 and 88. This morning, though, I watched a real winner on the 94 forcing the car ahead of it to break the law.

It happened on College Ave, heading in towards Davis. The traffic was stopped at the red light and backed up all the way to the library. There was a compact car in the left lane at the corner of College Ave and Winter Street (the one-way that goes between the Store 18 and the block with the realty agency and Nick's Deli-icious.) The car was stopped at the legal stop line well ahead of the vehicle in front of it, keeping the intersection free for anybody who needed to turn onto Winter Street. Only problem was, the 94 bus was behind this car and was growing impatient in the face of the red light.

It began to honk at the car. First briefly, then consistently. It wanted the car to move ahead and block the intersection, even though there's a sign right there on the corner that says DO NOT BLOCK INTERSECTION. Cars travelling north on College Ave who want to make a left onto Winter will often find jackasses blocking the intersection, and they hold up traffic behind them while the southbound traffic clears enough for them to make the turn. The compact car was obeying the law and following the rules and keeping that intersection clear, but this wasn't good enough for the 94 bus. It leaned on its horn as it loomed behind the tiny car. The compact driver finally relented and pulled ahead into the forbidden spot. This pleased the 94 bus, for it quickly swung out into the right-hand lane and sped over to the Store 18 stop.

I realize there's commuters on that bus waiting to get to the bus stop. But the bus has to obey all traffic laws to get to that stop -- and it certainly can't force other vehicles to break the traffic laws. And honestly, if it knew it would have to get to that bus stop, it should've been in the damn right hand lane to begin with.

I feel bad for the driver of the compact car, who was unnecessarily hassled and forced to do something they didn't want to do. In the grand scheme of things this isn't such a bad infraction, but it's bad driving habits to begin with and shouldn't be encouraged. I don't know if I'd have felt annoyed this way towards the honking vehicle if it had been like a regular pick-up truck or something, but it did rub me the wrong way this morning.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-24 03:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bostonista.livejournal.com
You should send this to the T, and cc the Glob.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-24 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ron_newman
This doesn't bother me that much. The T driver is just trying to stay on schedule.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-24 03:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metahacker.livejournal.com
I've been that compact car. The annoying bit comes when they lurch toward your back bumper, literally trying to scare you into moving.

It's this weighing process between the convenience of 30+ people versus the safety of one, and I alternate between annoyed and understanding on a per-case basis. One of my first driving experiences in Boston was nearly broadsiding a T bus who had made an (illegal) right on red in front of me, so I quickly learned how they ignore all laws of traffic at whim. But in London, I am told, a bus can never be at fault for any accident -- they are great whales moving in the ocean, and you move around them -- and while this makes some sense I worry if such a thing ever got loosed on Boston.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-24 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarcasma.livejournal.com
Ugh.

See also the TTC bus driver yesterday who roared out of an intersection directly behind a bike and just kept accelerating and honking till the bike had to swerve into the left lane of traffic in order to not DIE. Hi, bikes are allowed on the damn road (actually: required; they're not supposed to ride on the sidewalks, and it wouldn't be possible in the snow anyway) and certainly don't deserve to get RUN DOWN by a BUS just for existing.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-24 06:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dogofthefuture.livejournal.com
You make it sound as if it were the bus itself doing this.

Store 18

Date: 2007-01-24 07:26 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I'm happy to see that I'm not the only one who refers to the store as Store 18.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-25 12:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ndgmtlcd.livejournal.com
I was horrified when reading this!

A bus has absolute priority in Montreal, and bus drivers are well paid, with good benefits and considerable job security. But no bus driver would ever act in a dangerous manner towards any vehicle, powered or not, or put their passengers in danger of injury by some collision, however minor. They are very much aware of the power and inertia of their bus, at every instant.

Profile

spatch: (Default)
spatch

July 2019

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324 252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags