frustration
Mar. 31st, 2006 11:21 amToday I left home at the exact same time I did yesterday. Yesterday, I arrived at work 10 minutes early. Today, I arrived ten minutes late.
It's gotten to the point where the MBTA's horrible management and completely unpredictable service is no longer funny to me, especially in a job where you can get canned for too many late arrivals, regardless of your excuse.
(T) is for Terminal Unreliabili(T).
It's gotten to the point where the MBTA's horrible management and completely unpredictable service is no longer funny to me, especially in a job where you can get canned for too many late arrivals, regardless of your excuse.
(T) is for Terminal Unreliabili(T).
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 04:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 06:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 04:52 pm (UTC)were they going to PAY me for the extra 15 minutes i spent at work? goodness, no.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 04:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 05:19 pm (UTC)The newspaper's deadline doesn't change just because Muni was running late. Likewise, the people on the shift Spatch is replacing shouldn't have to stay late because the T was running late. When you have defined hours that you are expected to be at work, it's your responsibility to make sure you're there.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 06:17 pm (UTC)However, we adhere to the same rules that every other department in this call center must adhere to, and I really have no beef with that. But when I am reliant on public transportation (RELY being the key here!) and I cannot accurately pinpoint on any given day WITHIN TWENTY MINUTES when I will arrive, there's a problem here. And it's not with my company's policies.
It just absolutely infuriates me to be continually adjusting my schedule, pushing my commute time back and back and back, only to have the T keep putting me in later. That's just not cool.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 06:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 06:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 11:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 05:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 06:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 06:29 pm (UTC)Without sounding paranoid..
Date: 2006-03-31 06:29 pm (UTC)Re: Without sounding paranoid..
Date: 2006-03-31 10:34 pm (UTC)But really, the whole inner-city system is often said to be flailing while the T builds more and more commuter rail stations in rish suburbs. Although the idea of "Fix It First" is now in place, it'll probably take several years for any effects to trickle down to reality.
Re: Without sounding paranoid..
Date: 2006-03-31 07:09 pm (UTC)I'm not sure how the size of the Boston T area compares to the Toronto TTC, but I was very surprised here to find out how fast and reliable a bus-only route could be. The holdups on the subway, and the transfers from one train to another, negate the extra time gained by the actual speed of the vehicle.
Re: Without sounding paranoid..
Date: 2006-03-31 07:25 pm (UTC)Re: Without sounding paranoid..
Date: 2006-04-01 12:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 07:26 pm (UTC)Unfortunately, all I got for you today is:
Well, did he ever get to work? No, he never did and
his fate is still unknown.
(What a pity! Poor ole Spatch-el. Shame and scandal.
He may ride forever. Just like Paul Revere.)
He may ride forever 'neath the streets of Boston.
He's the man who never got there.
I dunno...it's just not scanning.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 10:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 11:39 pm (UTC)I think that public transport systems ought to have time clocks so that you can show your employer that you made the effort. That'd put economic pressure on the city to upgrade or improve the routes or whatever else is causing the delays. One can dream, spatch. One can dream.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-31 11:59 pm (UTC)THIS is my ish with muni too! thanks for putting it so succintly. i sometimes wish i could give up the public transit, but that would involve walking everywhere ... as in everywhere ... or (what's more likely) moving to a driveable city. which this one is not.