Dude, that blue guy is in f***ing Vietnam
Mar. 14th, 2007 11:58 amAnd in other news, the film adaptation of Watchmen currently in production appears to have, in the director's chair, a hyperactive 15-year-old who has just discovered whoa holy cow man, those graphic novel things, they're, like, serious and stuff:
Suuuuure. And maybe you can have Dr. Manhattan say something like "Had I retained my emotional core and olfactory sense, I would be able to remark at this point that I enjoy the smell of napalm at this particular time of day, for it resembles the scent exuded by victory."
This director's attitude does not make me feel confident at all about this project. He goes "Look, I'm an actual movie director!" and I'm like "You're f***ing kidding me!" And IMDB tells me this is the guy behind "THIS IS SPARTAAAAAA 300". Oh, boy.
Yeah, I have absolutely zero confidence in this project now. This is going to be Yet Another Alan Moore Project Turned To Shit On The Silver Screen. Listen, when even Terry Gilliam decides he can't turn a particular story into a film and still do it justice, maybe it's time to just stop trying.
"The thing about Watchmen is that I'm looking to make a movie that looks more like 'Taxi Driver' than Dick Tracy [laughs]. People bring that up to me 'Is it like 'Dick Tracy?'' because that's colorful. Watchmen as a printed medium references comic books itself. It goes 'Look, I'm a comic book' and you read it, you're like 'You're f***ing blowing my mind!' But that's what it tries to do, it draws you in by being a comic book. I think my responsibility is to draw the audience in by saying 'Look I'm just a movie' and then you get in there and it f***s you up. That's my hope anyway. It is a weird movie. When you see the trailer and you go 'Okay that looks like Richard Nixon. Dude that blue guy is in f***ing Vietnam, what is this?' There's a song you can not put in a Vietnam war movie and it's 'Ride Of the Valkyries' which should not be put it in any movie because of 'Apocalypse Now.' But in 'Watchmen,' you can imagine a sequence in 'Watchmen' where Dr. Manhattan is 100 feet tall stomping through the jungles of Vietnam with Hueys all over him, zapping the Vietcong while 'Ride of the Valkyries' is playing. It is transcendent of itself so you can reference 'Apocalypse Now' and that's okay. It is pop culture."Ok, so you can't put Ride of the Valkryies in a Vietnam movie because it's connected to Apocalypse Now, but if you put Ride of the Valkryies in a movie with a Vietnam scene that's cool cause you're dropping a mad crazy Apocalypse Now ref that is just soooooooooooooooooooooo clever, you have to hug yourself?
Suuuuure. And maybe you can have Dr. Manhattan say something like "Had I retained my emotional core and olfactory sense, I would be able to remark at this point that I enjoy the smell of napalm at this particular time of day, for it resembles the scent exuded by victory."
This director's attitude does not make me feel confident at all about this project. He goes "Look, I'm an actual movie director!" and I'm like "You're f***ing kidding me!" And IMDB tells me this is the guy behind "
Yeah, I have absolutely zero confidence in this project now. This is going to be Yet Another Alan Moore Project Turned To Shit On The Silver Screen. Listen, when even Terry Gilliam decides he can't turn a particular story into a film and still do it justice, maybe it's time to just stop trying.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:12 pm (UTC)Now I know.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:22 pm (UTC)I think that was Gilliam's take on it, too -- that Watchmen could only work as a miniseries and not as any kind of feature film under 3 hours in length. It's such a dense piece.
I mean, okay, I could live without the Tales of the Black Freighter parallel, but I'm hearing reports that even most of the Minutemen backstory is getting the axe in this one.
Yeah, it's gonna be LXG bad. Oh yeah. Hurt heap bad. Spatch fearful. Weep for universe. PRAY FOR MOJO.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:39 pm (UTC)Still wish Lucas would go and do Star Wars 1-3 though. Should be awesome.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 04:48 pm (UTC)I agree with you there. The crummy adaptations don't tarnish how much I enjoy the originals, but it's just a constant source of chagrin to first think "Hey, they're making a film version of something I really like! Hope it'll be neat, and make more folks want to check out the original" and then realize "Wow, this film version stinks on ice, now nobody's gonna want to try the original."
Sequels and prequels are a different thing, but along similar lines. You expect the goodness that made you enjoy the first, but more often than not you don't get that.
That said, I sure would love to know what happened to Neo and the gang after he saves Morpheus at the end of The Matrix and flies off into the sky.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 05:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 05:42 pm (UTC)I'm thinking this directorling might wanna ditch Watchmen and pick up The Boys. All the angst, none of the depth. Moore's clearly out of his ken, but Ennis might be just his speed. Plus lots of boobs. NC-rating = big opening weekend, plus no need to destroy a classic. Everybody wins.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 05:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 06:12 pm (UTC)If it doesn't involve shooting up the prototype models of a Caddilac CTS and Escalade, and those prototypes are instead used for production line design, it might ensure the future of the East Lansing GM plant.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 06:16 pm (UTC)No, wait, it was COMPLETELY HORRIBLE
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 06:21 pm (UTC)The accumulated filth will foam up, you know, rise up all desperate-like and shit, and they'll all look up to me and shout "Save us!" ... and I'll look down and say "Aw hell naw."
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 06:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 06:27 pm (UTC)Also: Goddamn. One of the problems with this sort of thing is that the IP is all tied up, so even if it sucks like fire, it's not too likely to be set right anytime soon. Sigh.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 06:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 06:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 06:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 07:02 pm (UTC)...yes, yes, I am! The Minutebabies would be vastly more entertaining than this fellow's "Dude, Where's My Alien Transporter?" dreck.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 07:17 pm (UTC)(Not that I actually watched the movie or anything, mind you: I just read lots of people commenting on how badly it ruined a great comic book, and figured the books were probably worth a try.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 09:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-15 01:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-15 01:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-15 03:02 pm (UTC)It doesn't mean it will be a great movie, but I think he's a far better choice for director than most people in Hollywood.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-15 03:33 pm (UTC)I do appreciate that Zack Snyder realizes that this project can't -- and won't -- be a Comic Book Movie. It is a very important distinction to make and critical in the film's development. But there was just something about his remarks that rubbed me the wrong way, and I think
Perhaps that's just semantics, but then again, appearance and presentation is everything. I wonder how 2001 would have been received if Stanley Kubrick had gone around on the press circuit saying things like "And then there's this part in space where you go to Jupiter, and you're like 'This is f***ing blowing my mind! There's that black stone thing again! Dude, that guy turned into a f***ing space baby! What's up with that?"
I mean, it's one thing for the audience to say it, especially if they're watching under, er, Optimum Late 60s Conditions, but for the director to do so? Doesn't exactly inspire confidence. Perhaps further reading is required. I do admit I'll have to give Snyder some benefit of the doubt if he's got enough respect for the source material, and maybe he does (the rights to 300 anecdote seems to be a good example) but the quote above certainly doesn't help reinforce that.
As far as any Watchmen project goes, however, I know any attempt is going to have its fans and its detractors, no matter how good or awful it is, no matter what it includes or omits. Just hope there's more good than awful.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-15 06:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-15 10:16 pm (UTC)The FINAL one, I hope.
I mean, of course there'll be more. But I've heard that Zak Snyder's adaptation of "Smax" is gonna be retooled into a new generation's Max Headroom origin story. So, THAT one will be at least be solid gold shit.