HEY AWESOME
May. 7th, 2007 08:05 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
1. The Great Gatsby is a story about a circus clown who falls in love with a one-armed stenographer and, after getting married on a Graaf Zeppelin, must team up to fight Bolsheviks on Easter Island.
2. It's perfectly legal and totally okay to, when you ride a bike down College Avenue, zip right between a double line of cars stopped at the Store 24 light and heydily hoidily zoom through the red light into the middle of Davis Square.
3. Curt Schilling is a pitcher for the Boston Red Sox.
One of those statements is true. One. Though I'd sure pony up money for that first story.
I watched the incident in #2 happen this morning. At the risk of stuffing this little feller here full of straw and waving him around angrily, I wonder if Mr. Wonder Biker is the same type of fellow who complains that cars don't treat bicyclists with respect. Would we have seen an angry, indignant post in
davis_square today had he clipped himself on someone's side view mirror or been cussed at by a driver in the line? Or would this guy, who's already shown he doesn't give a tinker's damn, have taken a header and then picked himself up, brushed himself off and started all over again?
But facts is facts, and if you're on a bike you obey the same traffic laws as a driver.
I'm growing increasingly curious about observing these idiot riders as there is a bicycle coming my way and, honestly, I grew up in towns with hills and almost-paved roads with wide shoulders and an infrequent number of automobiles coming by. This kind of urban riding annoys and unnerves me, and I want to enjoy nice happy fun ride time, but I don't want to be lumped into the same category as Tommy Trafficlight there to whom the rules of the road apparently don't apply. Also, I have a severe and distinct phobia of side view mirrors.
Luckily we do have a nice system of rail trails around which I believe I'll be enjoying now that the weather's nicer.
2. It's perfectly legal and totally okay to, when you ride a bike down College Avenue, zip right between a double line of cars stopped at the Store 24 light and heydily hoidily zoom through the red light into the middle of Davis Square.
3. Curt Schilling is a pitcher for the Boston Red Sox.
One of those statements is true. One. Though I'd sure pony up money for that first story.
I watched the incident in #2 happen this morning. At the risk of stuffing this little feller here full of straw and waving him around angrily, I wonder if Mr. Wonder Biker is the same type of fellow who complains that cars don't treat bicyclists with respect. Would we have seen an angry, indignant post in
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
But facts is facts, and if you're on a bike you obey the same traffic laws as a driver.
I'm growing increasingly curious about observing these idiot riders as there is a bicycle coming my way and, honestly, I grew up in towns with hills and almost-paved roads with wide shoulders and an infrequent number of automobiles coming by. This kind of urban riding annoys and unnerves me, and I want to enjoy nice happy fun ride time, but I don't want to be lumped into the same category as Tommy Trafficlight there to whom the rules of the road apparently don't apply. Also, I have a severe and distinct phobia of side view mirrors.
Luckily we do have a nice system of rail trails around which I believe I'll be enjoying now that the weather's nicer.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 01:40 pm (UTC)But you also can totally obey traffic laws on your bike, and be just fine. I don't run reds (okay, that's not true - on back streets I will stop and look for traffic and then go, if I'm not hauling the kid.) or split lanes and biking is still cheaper, faster, and more fun than a car or the bus. You'll get over the side view mirror thing - the space between a car and a bike looks a LOT wider from the bike's side.
And lots of urban riders crash all the time, and just get back up. The problems come when the cars think you should get out of the way when you *are* following traffic rules.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 01:54 pm (UTC)But I guess I'm not about to start my odyssey by purposefully taking the busiest streets in Boscamberville. Gotta start small and work yer way up. I figure the trepidation will subside eventually and I'll make it over to the Emerald Necklace by mid-2009.
Heh. I just realized that without local context, "Emerald Necklace" sounds like a location in an MMORPG or something.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-08 12:33 am (UTC)THANKS A LOT.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 02:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 02:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 03:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 03:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 04:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 04:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 04:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 02:46 pm (UTC)Seriously, blowing lights is stupid, it'll get you killed or cause an accident (just like it does when people blow them in cars). Rolling stops are different - the only reason more bikers do it than cars is because bikes are less likely to get a ticket. I mean, at stop signs you see cars not really stopping all the time, because it feels less illegal. But it's not. And everybody jaywalks part of the time. And at least around here, the law says you stop for pedestrians at ANY CORNER but nobody ever follows that. Street rules are more about common habits than the law.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 03:41 pm (UTC)I'd feel much better if street rules dealt with common sense more than common habit.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 03:26 pm (UTC)If I did half the shit in my car that I've seen on bikes, such as driving the wrong way down a one-way road, I'd have my license revoked.
Sheer physics says that a person on a bike is far more likely to come out the worse for wear in any accident with a car. The traffic laws ensure that we behave in a predictable manner with other cars and reduce the possibility of collision. So why people ignore both of these for some sort of freedom is a mystery to me. Freedom to be intensive care, perhaps.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 03:36 pm (UTC)Look at all the empty space around us at any given time.
Now what are the odds that your bike and someone else's car would attempt to occupy the same space at the same time?
Why, surely they're infinitesimal! Let's whiz on through! Whoopee! I'm an X-Wing Fighter today!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 03:46 pm (UTC)I once worked at a hotel and was out front when a woman riding down the sidewalk bumped into a car coming out of an alley. She demanded that the police be called at once. She was not happy to find out that she was at fault and was lucky to get off with no ticket.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 04:02 pm (UTC)That said, I'm pretty sure splitting the lane is allowed, though I'm not positive. And, while bikers tend to be more obvious about it (that is, they run the red when the light has been red for a while), I'm not actually convinced that more red lights are run by bikers than by drivers in this town.
It's still stupid. And i *hate* it when I get passed at a red light, only to pass that biker before the next red, where they pass me again, etc etc etc
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 06:51 pm (UTC)Stopping, looking, proceeding at least show common sense. Flying out into traffic shows you live life on the edge, baby, you're a rebel and you're doin it for the kicks!
ps your avatar mentioned hanging out sometime and I think that's an absolutely swell idea only I cannot find a working contact info
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 07:21 pm (UTC)- someone who has to hang out in boring traffic court sometimes, but it's okay because I get paid for it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-08 03:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 04:47 pm (UTC)*is confused*
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 04:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-07 08:00 pm (UTC)You know, I've read The Great Gatsby. Recently, even. Yet, I'm not sure I could, with all intellectual honesty, tell you that the above description is not entirely correct.
I demand
Date: 2007-05-08 12:37 am (UTC)pete
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-08 01:25 am (UTC)