Am rather amused.
Nov. 4th, 2007 11:01 amNews came down the wire last week that good ol' Fred Phelps and his anti-everybody-but-us Westboro Baptist Church would be visiting Boston to perform that special brand of picketing for which he and his family are known far and wide. When news hit
b0st0n, I made the following comment:
So, I figure, why not counter hate with laughter? Ignoring is a personal act. You can only get yourself to Just Don't Look, unless you have Paul Anka singing a song to help. You can't account for the actions of others. You've only got your own actions to worry about and if you feel as if you want to do something, hell, do it with laffs. Ignoring the hate doesn't make it go away, but if you get people to take it less seriously, you've diminished its impact and that's what counts. Fred Phelps is a coward and a bully and has gained his reputation from angering and condemning people he doesn't even know. He's gained his power to attract media attention solely due to his incendiary and confrontational tactics and the angry, shouty responses to them.
But the more you can make him look like a fool, the more you can point out that everything he says is a joke, nothing but complete and utter nonsense, the less power he has.
Some folks have taken the idea to heart and might be running with it today as Phelps spreads the hate around like so much manure. I won't be around to see it, but I hope it does something, if only to amuse those who are doing it.
I want to have a little band play one of those goofy comedy stingers ("shave and a haircut - two bits", rimshots, muted wah-wah-waaaaaah trumpets, etc.) to underscore the loud ranting he says.While I knew I wouldn't be able to cobble together an insouciant band (especially with a trombone, which can make some of the funniest noises a brass instrument could ever hope to make) I meant it. Too often hate, especially Phelps' kind of hate which compels him to picket funerals of AIDS victims and soldiers killed in Iraq, is countered with more hate and yelling and shouting and physical threats. All these responses give Phelps power. He feeds off it. He can use it as a sounding board for further action and condemnation.
Every thing he says, treat it like a comedy line. Take away his SERIOUS BUSINESS power.
So, I figure, why not counter hate with laughter? Ignoring is a personal act. You can only get yourself to Just Don't Look, unless you have Paul Anka singing a song to help. You can't account for the actions of others. You've only got your own actions to worry about and if you feel as if you want to do something, hell, do it with laffs. Ignoring the hate doesn't make it go away, but if you get people to take it less seriously, you've diminished its impact and that's what counts. Fred Phelps is a coward and a bully and has gained his reputation from angering and condemning people he doesn't even know. He's gained his power to attract media attention solely due to his incendiary and confrontational tactics and the angry, shouty responses to them.
But the more you can make him look like a fool, the more you can point out that everything he says is a joke, nothing but complete and utter nonsense, the less power he has.
Some folks have taken the idea to heart and might be running with it today as Phelps spreads the hate around like so much manure. I won't be around to see it, but I hope it does something, if only to amuse those who are doing it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-04 06:51 pm (UTC)At this point? S'all I got, friend. The fact that they've been raised and trained as lawyers means that if you try to slap a criminal case on 'em, they will play the First Amendment card all the way up as far as they can take the case. If they lose, it sets a dangerous precedent for any kind of protesting, and they know it. It's a Catch-22 and they know full well that they're cowardly hiding behind what the Right to Peaceably Assemble... though, honestly, "peaceably" is at question, innit?
It's a childish view. FIRST AMENDMENT! FIRST AMENDMENT! I CAN SAY WHAT I WANT! FREE SPEECH! FREE SPEECH! But they're not the first to hide behind it, and they won't be the last.
Now a civil case, on the other hand, is a different thing entirely. And don't think people haven't been trying to nail them down for years with one, and it's a darn good thing that they finally lost one in Maryland. However, if they've gone and hidden their assets as well as they have, the family's not going to get the money at all. I would hazard a guess that this was the first time someone had enough money and lawyer-fu to withstand their tenacious legal defense and win.
Right here and now, I don't have legal recourse for shit, and neither do most of the folks who wish they'd go away right about now. So you can either sit around wishing cancer upon them or counter-protesting to show your support for their current targets and your opposition to them.
The question is: Do you play angry just like them, or do you do something different? How do you put out the message "You have no power over us"?
Me, I wanna play the Do Something Different game. I wanna treat 'em like cartoon figures, and get people to laugh at them. Booing and jeering and angry epithets only go so far. So, then. Time to get silly. Frustrate 'em. Joke 'em if they can't take a fuck.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-04 07:37 pm (UTC)I love your idea. I love that it uses your first amendment right to counter and mock their speech rather than trying to suppress them by force of the police or magistrates.