spatch: (Corner Gas - NO)
[personal profile] spatch
Just saw this week's Doctor Who and you know, the episode was decent, all things considered, it had its moments, had some instances of human beings actually acting human, didn't feature any gratutitous kissing (at least, not involving Ten)...

...and then I saw the previews for next week before turning it off.

Oh god.

Oh god.

OH JOHN RINGO GOD NO.

I don't believe I've hollered "WHAT?! WHAT?! WHAT?! NO!!" at my televised media display screen before with quite the fervor as I just did, and that includes the response to the concrete slab-fucker scene from a few seasons ago.

There's only one way this little premise could work and if what we see next week is not that way, I fear next week I will be hollering "RUSSELL T. DAVIES YOU ARE DEAD TO ME, DO YOU HEAR ME? OOPS NO, YOU CAN'T, BECAUSE YOU ARE DEAD TO ME."

Sigh.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-05 02:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zhym.livejournal.com
What, a millennium of life, more or less, and you'd begrudge him one dance? He's the Doctor, not the 1,000 year-old virgin. Not having gotten busy at least once goes way past "restraint."

As children go, "love-child" is the best variety, I think.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-05 01:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theswordmaiden.livejournal.com
Yes, I realize it's commonly believed that to exercise sexual self-restraint is to be a virgin, but that's not what I said. It's already been established long ago that he had a family and I have no problem with that. I said that he could have been restrained enough to not have a love child pop up out of nowhere, not that he has to be a virgin, though I'll ignore what you say about the latter. I'm just sick of what I see on TV about self-restraint and I hope this won't be the billionth example.

As for love-children, I hope I made it clear that it's not them I have a problem with.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-05 04:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zhym.livejournal.com
Perhaps I just don't get what kind of child a "love-child" is supposed to be. I am not hip to the vernacular--what distinguishes a "love-child" from any other sort of child? Is that a hitherto-unknown child? The preview didn't sound like Ten was surprised that he had a daughter, just surprised that she'd popped up.

I'd expect the child to be from a previous regeneration anyway. Nine or Ten making babies would be very out-of-character, I agree. I don't know enough about Six, Seven, and Eight to have an opinion. Five? Maybe. Four? You just know he and Romana danced regularly. Two and Three seem unlikely candidates (I don't doubt that Three would, but he was stuck on Earth the whole time and I really don't see him as the type to be making babies with humans), and, of course, there's One and Susan's mother, which would make sense but probably isn't what's going to happen.

The point is that Nine and Ten have intimacy issues, but that's not necessarily true of the previous versions. I think there's also room between "dances every chance he gets" and "never dances" that leaves room for someone to dance once in a while without being a dancing fool about it.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-06 03:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theswordmaiden.livejournal.com
LOL, hurr indeed. But don't forget, when a person has huge intimacy issues, then obviously he will deal with it by having sex with a lot of people!!!

Anyway, I'm mainly hoping for a clone or Susan's mother.

Profile

spatch: (Default)
spatch

July 2019

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324 252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags