![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Just saw this week's Doctor Who and you know, the episode was decent, all things considered, it had its moments, had some instances of human beings actually acting human, didn't feature any gratutitous kissing (at least, not involving Ten)...
...and then I saw the previews for next week before turning it off.
Oh god.
Oh god.
OHJOHN RINGO GOD NO.
I don't believe I've hollered "WHAT?! WHAT?! WHAT?! NO!!" at my televised media display screen before with quite the fervor as I just did, and that includes the response to the concrete slab-fucker scene from a few seasons ago.
There's only one way this little premise could work and if what we see next week is not that way, I fear next week I will be hollering "RUSSELL T. DAVIES YOU ARE DEAD TO ME, DO YOU HEAR ME? OOPS NO, YOU CAN'T, BECAUSE YOU ARE DEAD TO ME."
Sigh.
...and then I saw the previews for next week before turning it off.
Oh god.
Oh god.
OH
I don't believe I've hollered "WHAT?! WHAT?! WHAT?! NO!!" at my televised media display screen before with quite the fervor as I just did, and that includes the response to the concrete slab-fucker scene from a few seasons ago.
There's only one way this little premise could work and if what we see next week is not that way, I fear next week I will be hollering "RUSSELL T. DAVIES YOU ARE DEAD TO ME, DO YOU HEAR ME? OOPS NO, YOU CAN'T, BECAUSE YOU ARE DEAD TO ME."
Sigh.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 06:17 am (UTC)Stormee Saxon!
Date: 2008-05-04 06:22 am (UTC)She dices!
She's a Tom Robbins character come to life!
But wait! There's more!
She's a nuclear phyisicist!
She can suck the chrome off of trailer hitches!
She can pick up her car keys without using her hands!
NOW HOW MUCH WOULD YOU PAY?!!??
Re: Stormee Saxon!
Date: 2008-05-04 06:48 am (UTC)"I'm appalled, with two p's."
Re: Stormee Saxon!
Date: 2008-05-04 07:01 am (UTC)Re: Stormee Saxon!
Date: 2008-05-04 03:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 06:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 06:52 am (UTC)workbe mentioned, where Romana II and K-9 leave Warrior's Gate eventually, only to discover that Four knocked her up before leaving E-space. This would then lead to some awkward questions, such as why the Doctor's daughter only appears to Ten, while the granddaughter appeared with One? Perhaps Ten could give a response similar to Worf, when he was asked why the Klingons of yore look so different than him.(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 11:18 am (UTC)Unfortunately I don't think it'll happen that way, and we'll have Retcon Girl getting her own spinoff on BBC Three (just after Torchwood!) before we know it.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 01:44 pm (UTC)If she were, though, I wouldn't be that upset, really. Some fans seem really upset by the idea of the Doctor ever having sex at all, and there's that whole Lungbarrow business in the tie-in media, wherein the Doctor's chastity is maintained and the "Grandfather" business explained by means so complicated and messed-up that I don't even want to bother explaining them here. But I prefer to imagine that Susan really was his granddaughter by normal means, and the new series has dropped hints that suggest that that's the case.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 02:04 pm (UTC)I never delved into the Lungbarrow stuff. I have no qualms with the Doctor actually having a family (and he's talked about it, in whatever vague terms, recently.) The Doctor having Time Lord procreative activity some time in the series' past is not quibblicious. The Doctor going round boffing females from other species simply because OMG A MAN AND A WOMAN IN TARDIS MUST MEAN SEXUAL TENSION WHICH HAS TO BE RESOLVED is most quibblicious and incredibly irksome. In other words, you don't Do It for the sake of It being done unless you're on Torchwood.
Sexual relations are implied by offspring, sure... oh, wait, this is Rusty we're talking about, isn't it? He'll be about as subtle as a goddamn bulldozer with it. Argh.
I'm REALLY hoping it really is Susan's mom. I'm REALLY hoping it's not going to be a fake-out, a cop-out, a false memory ("...not a dream, a twin sister, or an indestructible robot") or a re-creation of Gallifrey built entirely by nanobots (sup Red Dwarf.) That kind of shit is the worst kind of shit.
I am hoping beyond hope, here, and even justifying: given that the Doctor regenerates into younger and younger-looking folks (and that women Time Lords can, as Romana showed us, pick their look) it wouldn't be a surprise to see his daughter doing the same. That she's gone all Catherine Zeta-Jones Entrapment on us and leaping like nimble minx through the Laser Beams of Pure Cliche has nothing to do with it.
It would be very nice to actually get more information on the Doctor's former family without it turning into a fake or a lovechild from Leela or Nyssa or something equally STUPID AND DUMB AND STUPID.
I'm now trying to scour the continuity trough here and see if there was any spoken amendment to Face of Boe's "You are not alone" which turned it into "You are not alone but that just means there'll be only one other guy and by the way he'll be your eternal nemesis and you'll kill him only you'll actually just be putting him in a coma and he'll wake up in 1973 oops wait wrong show."
I'm scared, man. I don't wanna be wrong about this because I can't see any other way this would work out well.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-05 02:51 pm (UTC)I'm a bad Whovian, so I was all "his daughter"?
Which then led my wife into a monologue about how he was originally travelling with his granddaughter in the first series, and a short viewing of the original (?) Dalek episode where he stole her shoes.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-06 01:46 pm (UTC)Course not. However, I did think the eighth season was the weakest one (apart from Rimmer kicking Death in the goolies.) Then again I'm a fan of the first few seasons and well aware the show's tone has changed over time, so it's not the same show, but still.
Anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 06:54 am (UTC)BTW, you do know that the woman playing the Doctor's daughter in next week's episode is the real-life daughter of Peter Davison? Cute, that.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 07:08 am (UTC)Scratch the first line in the above post.
While brushing my teeth, I became enlightened by this little premise of yours. Jennifer, the Doctor's daughter, is a blonde, and we've seen two appearances so far this season of another blonde. I really hope this isn't the direction RTD goes...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 12:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 02:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 02:10 pm (UTC)(I'm definitely the dorkiest fangrrl who ever fangrrled, but there is some shit up with which I will not put.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 02:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 04:57 pm (UTC)As for The Doctor's daughter: I'm more optimistic than most. It does open lots of questions, but the mere existence of a daughter doesn't bug me. He's 900+ years old. Surely in all that time the Doctor has "danced" more than a few times, and he had a granddaughter, so we know he could spawn. Why not a daughter?
A daughter who is a blonde Lara Croft...well, that doesn't bode well. But the season has been very good so far, so I'll wait until the episode shows before fretting about it.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-05 02:35 am (UTC)I think it's the possibility of having some love-child that bothers us. I don't care how many centuries old he is, he can still choose not to dance and that kind of a past is just not inevitable. I guess it's so hard to find characters on good TV shows who do not or have not been able to exercise sexual self-restraint, that I'm holding out hope here. (I might be watching too much BSG though)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-05 02:54 am (UTC)As children go, "love-child" is the best variety, I think.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-05 01:27 pm (UTC)As for love-children, I hope I made it clear that it's not them I have a problem with.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-05 01:45 pm (UTC)The whole love-child angle, on the other hand, just plain stinks and would imply that Russell T. Davies just can't conceive (hurr) of a character who, WITH OBVIOUS INTIMACY ISSUES, would opt not to Dance, as it were. I agree, it's refreshing to have a character who doesn't want to Dance every chance he gets, and still stay compelling.
But on the other hand, there's... the other hand. All this will be neatly sidestepped if it turns out Jennywho was indeed cloned from the Jar Hand and I'll be simultaneously relieved yet annoyed.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-05 04:35 pm (UTC)I'd expect the child to be from a previous regeneration anyway. Nine or Ten making babies would be very out-of-character, I agree. I don't know enough about Six, Seven, and Eight to have an opinion. Five? Maybe. Four? You just know he and Romana danced regularly. Two and Three seem unlikely candidates (I don't doubt that Three would, but he was stuck on Earth the whole time and I really don't see him as the type to be making babies with humans), and, of course, there's One and Susan's mother, which would make sense but probably isn't what's going to happen.
The point is that Nine and Ten have intimacy issues, but that's not necessarily true of the previous versions. I think there's also room between "dances every chance he gets" and "never dances" that leaves room for someone to dance once in a while without being a dancing fool about it.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-06 03:21 pm (UTC)Anyway, I'm mainly hoping for a clone or Susan's mother.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-07 04:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 06:50 pm (UTC)Doctor: 'she's my daughter!'
(Other Stuff Happens a Little)
Daughter: 'Hi, dad!'
Me: You know, we probably didn't need BOTH of those lines in the TRAILER.
(Or, indeed, probably in the episode.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-05 01:37 pm (UTC)Or maybe all she gets to say is "Hi, Dad!" before getting inexplicably hit by a truck and we get More Emo Doctor for a while.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 08:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 08:54 pm (UTC)My money is on the Doctor visiting Earth in 1968, meeting the failed pilot team of Gary Seven and Teri Garr, and hooking up with the latter. Makes as much sense as anything else.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 09:28 pm (UTC)OH DON'T YOU DO IT.
Also, I grabbed the SA image: http://www.spatch.net/rtdavies-title.jpg
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-05 05:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-04 10:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-12 02:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-12 01:45 pm (UTC)All I know is that (in the draft I'm writing) the episode really screamed out for a four-part serial because there was not enough time for any sort of decent character development.